Rizik od povjerljivosti kod ChatGPT
Mnogi ljudi već traže pravne savjete od AI, uključujući ChatGPT. Međutim, razgovori sa ChatGPT-om nisu zaštićeni istim pravnim privilegijama kao razgovori sa advokatom, terapeutom ili doktorom, upozorio je izvršni direktor OpenAI.
Altman je otvoreno rekao: "Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor... there's legal privilege for it. There’s doctor-patient confidentiality, there’s legal confidentiality," the CEO said. "And we haven’t figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT." To znači da razgovori sa chatbotom mogu biti otkriveni i korišteni kao dokaz ukoliko ih sud zatraži.
Advokat Jessee Bundy već duže upozorava korisnike da korištenje ChatGPT-a za ugovore, pravna pitanja ili strategiju kreira otkriveni dokaz. "If you’re pasting in contracts, asking legal questions, or asking [the chatbot] for strategy, you're not getting legal advice," the lawyer tweeted. "You’re generating discoverable evidence. No attorney-client privilege. No confidentiality. No ethical duty. No one to protect you."
Bundy je dodala: "It might feel private, safe, and convenient," she continued. "But lawyers are bound to protect you. ChatGPT isn’t — and can be used against you." Kada je dobila odgovor od AI zagovornika: "I think it is both, no?" uslijedila je žustra reakcija: "For the love of God — no," i: "ChatGPT can’t give you legal advice."
Njeni ključni stavovi: "Legal advice comes from a licensed professional who understands your specific facts, goals, risks, and jurisdiction. And is accountable for it," i "ChatGPT is a language model. It generates words that sound right based on patterns, but it doesn’t know your situation, and it’s not responsible if it’s wrong." "That’s not advice," Bundy declared. "That’s playing legal Mad Libs."
OpenAI se trenutno bori na sudu oko pristupa korisničkim chat zapisima, a dok presuda ne bude donesena, razgovori sa ChatGPT-om mogu biti predmet otkrivanja. Koristite oprez pri dijeljenju osjetljivih informacija sa AI.
